首页> 外文OA文献 >Biogeography in deep time - What do phylogenetics, geology, and paleoclimate tell us about early platyrrhine evolution?
【2h】

Biogeography in deep time - What do phylogenetics, geology, and paleoclimate tell us about early platyrrhine evolution?

机译:深度生物地理学 - 系统发育学,地质学和古气候学告诉我们早期的植物进化是什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Molecular data have converged on a consensus about the genus-level phylogeny of extant platyrrhine monkeys, but for most extinct taxa and certainly for those older than the Pleistocene we must rely upon morphological evidence from fossils. This raises the question as to how well anatomical data mirror molecular phylogenies and how best to deal with discrepancies between the molecular and morphological data as we seek to extend our phylogenies to the placement of fossil taxa. Here I present parsimony-based phylogenetic analyses of extant and fossil platyrrhines based on an anatomical dataset of 399 dental characters and osteological features of the cranium and postcranium. I sample 16 extant taxa (one from each platyrrhine genus) and 20 extinct taxa of platyrrhines. The tree structure is constrained with a "molecular scaffold" of extant species as implemented in maximum parsimony using PAUP with the molecular-based 'backbone' approach. The data set encompasses most of the known extinct species of platyrrhines, ranging in age from latest Oligocene (∼26 Ma) to the Recent. The tree is rooted with extant catarrhines, and Late Eocene and Early Oligocene African anthropoids. Among the more interesting patterns to emerge are: (1) known early platyrrhines from the Late Oligocene through Early Miocene (26-16.5Ma) represent only stem platyrrhine taxa; (2) representatives of the three living platyrrhine families first occur between 15.7 Ma and 13.5 Ma; and (3) recently extinct primates from the Greater Antilles (Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola) are sister to the clade of extant platyrrhines and may have diverged in the Early Miocene. It is probable that the crown platyrrhine clade did not originate before about 20-24 Ma, a conclusion consistent with the phylogenetic analysis of fossil taxa presented here and with recent molecular clock estimates. The following biogeographic scenario is consistent with the phylogenetic findings and climatic and geologic evidence: Tropical South America has been a center for platyrrhine diversification since platyrrhines arrived on the continent in the middle Cenozoic. Platyrrhines dispersed from tropical South America to Patagonia at ∼25-24 Ma via a "Paraná Portal" through eastern South America across a retreating Paranense Sea. Phylogenetic bracketing suggests Antillean primates arrived via a sweepstakes route or island chain from northern South America in the Early Miocene, not via a proposed land bridge or island chain (GAARlandia) in the Early Oligocene (∼34 Ma). Patagonian and Antillean platyrrhines went extinct without leaving living descendants, the former at the end of the Early Miocene and the latter within the past six thousand years. Molecular evidence suggests crown platyrrhines arrived in Central America by crossing an intermittent connection through the Isthmus of Panama at or after 3.5Ma. Any more ancient Central American primates, should they be discovered, are unlikely to have given rise to the extant Central American taxa in situ.
机译:分子数据已经就现存的扁桃猴的属水平系统发育达成共识,但是对于大多数绝种的类群,当然对于早于更新世的类群,我们必须依靠化石的形态学证据。这就提出了一个问题,即当我们试图将系统发育扩展到化石分类单元的位置时,解剖数据如何很好地反映分子系统发育,以及如何最好地处理分子和形态数据之间的差异。在这里,我基于399个牙齿特征以及颅骨和颅骨的骨学特征的解剖学数据集,对现存和化石桔梗进行了基于简约的系统发育分析。我采样了16个现存的类群(每个platyrrhine属一个)和20个已灭绝的platyrrhines。树木的结构被现存物种的“分子支架”所束缚,这是通过使用基于分子的“骨架”方法的PAUP在最大程度简化下实现的。该数据集涵盖了大多数已知灭绝的桔梗种类,其年龄范围从最新渐新世(约26 Ma)到最近。该树根植于现存的卡他碱,始新世晚期和渐新世早期非洲类人猿。在出现的更有趣的模式中:(1)已知从渐新世晚期到中新世早期(26-16.5Ma)的早期桔梗仅代表茎桔梗类群; (2)三个活泼尿家族的代表首先出现在15.7 Ma和13.5 Ma之间; (3)来自大安的列斯群岛(古巴,牙买加,伊斯帕尼奥拉)的近来灭绝的灵长类动物是现存的桔梗进化枝的姊妹,并且可能在中新世早期分化了。大概在20-24 Ma之前,冠状柏树进化枝可能不是起源的,这一结论与此处提出的化石分类群的系统发育分析以及最近的分子钟估计一致。以下生物地理情况与系统发育研究结果以及气候和地质证据相符:自南美白arrived到达中新生代以来,南美热带地区一直是太平洋白多样化的中心。桔梗在约25-24 Ma时从南美热带地区扩散到巴塔哥尼亚,通过“巴拉那门户”穿过南美东部穿越后撤的帕拉嫩塞海。系统发育包围表明,安提尔灵长类灵长类动物是从中新世早期从南美洲北部通过抽奖路线或岛屿链到达的,而不是在渐新世早期(〜34 Ma)通过拟建的陆桥或岛屿链(GAARlandia)到达的。巴塔哥尼亚和安的列斯犬的垂体绝种没有留下活着的后代,前者在中新世早期结束,后者在过去的六千年里。分子证据表明,皇冠桔梗在3.5Ma或之后穿过巴拿马地峡的断续连接而到达中美洲。如果发现中美洲的任何更古老的灵长类动物,都不太可能在原地引起现存的中美洲类群。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kay, RF;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号